Thursday, May 05, 2016

Towards a Cashless Society

If there was any doubt that we are being steered toward a cashless society, then this latest news should assuage those doubts:
The European Central Bank (ECB) says it will no longer produce the €500 (£400; $575) note because of concerns it could facilitate illegal activities. The decision comes in the wake of a European Commission inquiry in February into the way the notes are used. Senior ECB officials said at the time that they needed more evidence that the notes facilitated criminal activity. The UK asked banks to stop handling €500 notes in 2010 after a report found they were mainly used by criminals. The ECB says the €500 banknote remains legal tender and will always retain its value. It will stop issuing the note around the end of 2018, when it will bring in new €100 and €200 banknotes.
A report earlier this year for the Harvard Kennedy School, urged the world's 20 largest economies to stop issuing the largest notes in circulation - £50, $100 and €500 notes - to tackle crime. Peter Sands, former chief executive of Standard Chartered bank, said the high-denomination notes were favoured by terrorists, drug lords and tax evaders. Illegal money flows exceed $2 trillion (£1.4 trillion) a year, he said.
The report from the Harvard Kennedy School is titled Making it Harder for the Bad Guys: The Case for Eliminating High Denomination Notes and the predictable villains are cited as a justification for this: terrorists, drug lords and tax evaders. If you're not a "bad guy" then how could you possibly object to this? If you do object, then maybe you are a "bad guy" and the powers-that-ought-not-be should take a closer look at your financial transactions: maybe raid your home and carry off your computing devices. 

Make no doubt about it: cash is on the way out but the world will be a better place as a result because the "bad guys" will be bankrupt and the "good guys" will have triumphed. Let's hope that cryptocurrencies like BitCoin can disrupt the pursuit of this agenda by the banksters of the global elite.

Saturday, April 16, 2016

The Illusion of Continuous Consciousness

New 'Time Slice' Theory Suggests You're Not as Conscious as You Think You Are
I've long felt human consciousness is not continuous but made up of discrete sensory snapshots. This article that I came across today seems to confirm that notion of mine.
Our conscious perception of the world feels like a continuous and uninterrupted flow, but a new study suggests that it’s actually more like the frames of a movie reel running through a projector.

There’s still a lot we don’t know about consciousness and how it arises in the brain. Even though perception—such as vision and hearing—feels smooth and uninterrupted, neuroscientists aren’t entirely sure if it flows continuously like water through a tap or if it’s more like the aforementioned 24-frame-per-second movie reel.

A team of European researchers now say it’s more like the latter—but with a twist. Their new conceptual framework, published in PLOS Biology, suggests that we initially process incoming sensory information in an unconscious state, which then shifts to full perceptual awareness. And it all happens in blips, or “time slices,” lasting for as long as 400 millisecond intervals.

The two-stage model of visual perception
Image: Michael H. Herzog et al., 2016/PLOS Biology

New 'Time Slice' Theory Suggests You're Not as Conscious as You Think You Are 
The new model, developed by Michael Herzog from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL) and Frank Scharnowski from the University of Zurich, proposes a two-stage processing of sensory information. During the first phase, the brain processes specific features of an object, say, its color or shape. This scanning is done semi-continuously, but we humans are completely unaware that it’s happening. During this first phase, even changes to the object (like a change in its color or brightness) aren’t consciously perceived.

But then comes the second stage: the transference of the stimulus to actual conscious perception. During this stage, the brain renders the perceived features after the unconscious processing has been completed. We experience all this as qualia (i.e. subjective) conscious experience arising from sense perception. It’s like that moment when a polaroid film reveals its hidden details and we’re finally aware of what we’re looking at—except this process happens so fast that we’re oblivious to the “developing” phase.

“When unconscious processing is ‘completed,’” the researchers explained in the study, “all features are simultaneously rendered conscious at discrete moments in time, sometimes even hundreds of milliseconds after stimuli were presented.”

That means there’s a lag from when we first experience something, to when we’re actually aware of it. (This might actually explain the flash-lag illusion.) This entire two-stage process, from start to finish, can last up to 400 milliseconds—which is a long time from a psychological perspective.

“The reason is that the brain wants to give you the best, clearest information it can, and this demands a substantial amount of time,” Herzog said in a statement. “There is no advantage in making you aware of its unconscious processing, because that would be immensely confusing.”

Herzog and Scharnowski’s model suggests we’re not as conscious as we think we are. If they’re right, it means we’re unconscious for a significant portion of our waking life. But like the gaps between film slides, we’re unaware of these “black outs.”

The implication is that there’s no such thing as a continuous and immutable self nor is there an ever-present soul. Instead, our brains are constantly churning out snapshots of perception, which to us feel real and consistent. Combined with other aspects of cognition (like memory), it gives rise to self-awareness and the impression that we live in a coherent universe.

This new model only considers visual processing. Something very different may be happening in the brain when it processes other information, such as sound, touch, or smell. That said, the research offers a more complete picture of brain functioning than what’s presented by advocates if the simplistic “continuous or discrete” view of human consciousness.
The comment about an ever-present soul seems oddly unconnected with the experiment but the idea that there's no such thing as a continuous and immutable self is right on the money. We're unconscious for a significant portion of our waking life and instead flash in and out of conscious awareness. Let's say the dots below represent these flashes of conscious awareness:
.          .          .          .

Let say the time interval between the dots is 400 milliseconds or 0.4 seconds as I infer from the article. This means one flash every 0.4 seconds, corresponding to a frequency for consciousness of 2.5 Hz. This suggests other modes of awareness at different frequencies with the possibility of beats occurring with certain frequency combinations.

What I'm getting at is that could it be that these frequencies become higher as consciousness becomes attuned to the various levels of the higher planes (the astral and mental)? As the level of consciousness rises, the time between blackouts decreases and disappears completely when undifferentiated unity is realised.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Life and the Movies

I watch a lot of movies, so many that I forget what I've even watched. I'm absorbed in each movie as I watch it but then it's over and I move on. Our life is like that. We get absorbed in it and then it's over and we move on. The main difference between our life and a movie we are watching is that we are also the star actor in the movie of our life. Yet, we still watch the movie as we watch ourselves act and watch others interact with us. Our actions and reactions are central to how the movie plays out.

Given that we are the star actor, it's no wonder that we are deeply absorbed in the movie of our life. In any given movie, we usually identify with an actor and suffer with her or him as the plot unfolds. When the actor is myself, the absorption is almost complete except when we suffer some shock that causes temporary dissociation. At such a time, we are simply the watcher and no longer absorbed in our acting role. If it happens, it doesn't last for long and soon we are back in our favourite role. It's a role we relish no matter what our mood. Especially when we are suffering, we are deeply immersed.

It's all quite normal of course, everybody does it, but the fact remains that we are playing a role (dramatic, comedic or whatever) in an episode of an ongoing series. The episode is our current life and it is but one in a very long series of lives. We have become addicted to the series and watch episode after episode, reviewing the life just lived in between lives as we prepare for the next. In certain lives, we struggle just to stay alive amidst war, famine and disease. There is little time for objectivity. In other lives however, we will have time to contemplate our role playing, recognise it for what it is, and realise that only the watcher was real. I, the actor, was a temporary psychological construct. 

Rarely does this happen however, because it's unsettling to think of ourself as a psychological construct. Yet that is what we are. Our deconstruction will begin immediately following the death of our physical bodies. While the drama of our lives is playing out before us, we can begin to identify more with the watcher than the actor but such is our psychological investment in the latter that true detachment is almost impossible. The sense of I is so strong that it cannot be extinguished. It's like trying to swallow yourself, as the ouroboros does, so that you disappear completely. After that achievement, the watcher realises that there never was anything to watch in the first place. Only very few achieve this.